<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Water Conservation Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keetsa.com/blog/eco-friendly/water-conservation-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keetsa.com/blog/eco-friendly/water-conservation-tips/</link>
	<description>Keetsa! Blog is about eco-friendly and green stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:47:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rev-up</title>
		<link>http://keetsa.com/blog/eco-friendly/water-conservation-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-61340</link>
		<dc:creator>rev-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keetsa.com/blog/eco-friendly/water-conservation-tips/#comment-61340</guid>
		<description>These seem more like tips on how to cut one&#039;s water bill than how to &quot;conserve&quot; water.  One only wastes water by contaminating it.  Why not post research, if it is available, focused on reclaiming water (if less water per flush results in a higher concentration of pollutants in the water, is it, thereby, more difficult to &quot;reclaim&quot; OR is mixing more water per flush in to the sewage stream resulting in more contaminated water).  Our natural resources should be our greatest concern.  Some solid research and operational terms would be, at least, advantageous to turning the tide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These seem more like tips on how to cut one&#8217;s water bill than how to &#8220;conserve&#8221; water.  One only wastes water by contaminating it.  Why not post research, if it is available, focused on reclaiming water (if less water per flush results in a higher concentration of pollutants in the water, is it, thereby, more difficult to &#8220;reclaim&#8221; OR is mixing more water per flush in to the sewage stream resulting in more contaminated water).  Our natural resources should be our greatest concern.  Some solid research and operational terms would be, at least, advantageous to turning the tide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taike</title>
		<link>http://keetsa.com/blog/eco-friendly/water-conservation-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-61300</link>
		<dc:creator>taike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keetsa.com/blog/eco-friendly/water-conservation-tips/#comment-61300</guid>
		<description>I was reading an article submitted to me by my state water management facility in maryland which says a standard garden hose can use 100 gallons of water for 10 minutes of washing a car. I agree to go to a professional since they recycle the water or you can use a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rejuvenateauto.com/car-wash-waterless.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;waterless car wash&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading an article submitted to me by my state water management facility in maryland which says a standard garden hose can use 100 gallons of water for 10 minutes of washing a car. I agree to go to a professional since they recycle the water or you can use a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.rejuvenateauto.com/car-wash-waterless.php" >waterless car wash</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
