Comments on: Russia test eco friendly bomb

By: CandyWWGM

CandyWWGM — Wed, 27 May 2009 10:36:36 +0000

Interesting … an eco-friendly bomb that doesn’t poison our planet with deadly radiation. Our ecosystems, habitats and wildlife are destroyed and killed immediately, as opposed to a slow death from radiation poisoning. So this is a good thing?

I cannot help but wonder, why in this day and age, countries are still developing weapons of mass destruction like this? Has society not yet advanced enough to be above obliterating each other? Sorry, have lived through several conflicts growing up overseas and have seen how innocent lives and environments are affected first-hand by the decisions of a few. Guess its a controversy with no end, and many sides.

Why can’t we just drop daisies on other countries and tell them we love them :p

By: Michey

Michey — Fri, 22 May 2009 15:01:32 +0000

I love this world!! men with small willies trying there hardest to say I have a bigger one than you. What wrong with these people can they find something constructive to do in there own country, like helping the poor the old, the economy. it staggers belief how much is this costing?

By: Cragsy

Cragsy — Sat, 16 May 2009 22:16:46 +0000

not evaporated exactly…. more likely atomised =)
also this will not only destroy living matter but clothes etc due to the fact a vacuum bomb is still the ignition of fuel, with massive energy output…

By: Nata

Nata — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:03:15 +0000

doesn’t that make you feel better….they won’t harm the environment…while killing millions of people….its revolutionary

By: Correnzo

Correnzo — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:41:13 +0000

Hehaa… THe application of this weapon would be to attack other countries. You wouldnt use a nuke because there would be too much contamination and fallout. You would get plenty of irradiated land, thats freakin useless. If there is nothing to plunder, the war is pointless. On the upside, this bomb would make for some mad loot times, going through their pockets and looking for loose change and all.

By: corrections

corrections — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:04:53 +0000

Note, this bomb is not nearly as powerful as the smallest nuclear bombs, as it has a blast radius of only 300 meters, yielding 47 tons of TNT. So the blast is equivalent to 47 tons of TNT, while the bomb weighs in at what, 8 tons. For comparison, a W88 nuclear warhead yields 475 kilotons (10k times more than this) while the device itself weighs 1/16th of this. So a 160000 times deficiency compared to a nuke (Extends into the millions when you compare it with the b41 25 megaton warhead). conventional explosives based on purely electromagnetic reactions can never get close to the reactions imposed by the strong interaction.

By: Jake

Jake — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:39:31 +0000

WHY don’t we just use a and h bombs alog with that bomb! That is a scary thought

By: Xanthos

Xanthos — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:22:45 +0000

Are they retarded? These have been around for ages… it’s called a neutron bomb, which does the exact same thing: evaporating organic material.

They’re good for use as a tactical weapon(i.e. border defense) thanks to the lack of contaminant radiation emission, but if you’re attacking other countries, it seems like you’d prefer something that does more damage, like its predecessors, due to being more destructive and causing far greater damage. A and H bombs haven’t been completely shown up in that aspect, so they can still be of use.

Hopefully we won’t have to use them, but with the current state of things, I wouldn’t be surprised if nuclear war broke out in the near future.

By: Chris

Chris — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:29:06 +0000

WTF?! What good is it if it still kills everything?

By: Lera

Lera — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:21:45 +0000

“evaporate”?! as in im going to turn into water vapor?

By: Marius

Marius — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:20:05 +0000

May God have mercy on our souls…..

By: dan

dan — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:15:48 +0000

goin’ green lmao

By: funky

funky — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:49:31 +0000

Awesome!!

By: Eco-Friendly…. Bomb? | ecogadget

Eco-Friendly…. Bomb? | ecogadget — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:31:39 +0000

[...] via Keetsa Blog [...]